data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2dfb/c2dfb4c6577b548424fc2545e93e88d2c6f0a8da" alt=""
The New York Times is reporting today about the pending testimony of Monica Goodling. Goodling was granted partial immunity this week. I for one will be looking forward to hearing what she has to say.
What I don’t know, is how far her immunity goes, and what it covers. I will be digging around and looking when I have time. (Unfortunately, I have a project due Monday, so I have to go into work today.)
The thing I bring away from this article is that it sounds like the Party and the Justice Dept. are going to set her up as the fall guy. I think she will be portrayed as a loose canon that was acting out of her own heartfelt conviction and not on any orders from above.
Time will tell if I’m right, but I’ll bet I am.
2 comments:
But we all know that the idea of a loose cannon in the Republicans is not possible. To paraphrase the Admiral in The Hunt for Red October (played by Fred Thompson...) "The Republicans don't take a dump without a plan, son." That's why the question is who told Ms. Goodling to do what she did, and who let her do it?
We know that, but I also know what to expect.
Post a Comment